Efficient Handover Approach in 5G Mobile Networks

Mohammad Alnabhan, Enas Al-qatawneh, Ahmad Abadleh, Mohammed Salem Atoum, Mohammad Alnawyseh


Femtocell technology has improved cellular coverage and capacity allowing the provision of rich and interactive communication services in current mobile networks. However, this technology suffers from several drawbacks including; increased interference and packet loss, frequent handovers, and high energy consumption. This paper presents a new handover management approach to overcome performance limitations linked to handover taking place at dense femtocell environments. RSSI of Base Station (BS), mobile user’s movement direction, and BS available capacity are factors used in this work to improve handover decision while sustaining perceived network performance. In addition, in order to reduce the complexity and delay of handover process, the proposed approach has redefined handover major phases including; preparation, decision and execution phases. A densely deployed simulated environment representing heterogeneous 4G and 5G architecture was implemented to evaluate the proposed approach. The simulation environment consists of three paths, each path represents a different network and mobility condition including BS distribution, obstacles, UE movement direction and distance. Results confirmed that the proposed handover approach reported an improved performance in terms of handover delay and number of unnecessary handovers. The average number of handovers occurred during all simulation scenarios was 3, also the average handover delay achieved was (55.15 ms). The number of handovers were decreased 30% and handover delay was reduced more than 10 ms comparing to conventional handover approaches such RSS-based. Hence, an improved adoption of handover management into femotocell environment.


5G; femtocell; RSSI; handover; QoS.

Full Text:



Shariat, M. Bulakci, O. De Domenico, A. Mannweiler, C. Gramaglia, M. Wei, Q. Gopalasingham A. Pateromichelakis, E. Moggio, F. Tsolkas, Gajic, D. Rates Crippa B., Khatibi, S. (2019). A flexible Network Architecture for 5G Systems, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Volume 2019, Article ID 5264012.

Tudzarov, A., & Janevski, T. (2011). Design for 5G mobile network architecture. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 3(2), 112.â€

Zenalden, F. (2017). Vertical Handover in Wireless Heterogeneous Networks. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC). 9(1). Pp.81-85.

Suárez-Rodríguez, C. & He, Y. & Jayawickrama, B. & Dutkiewicz, E. (2019). Low-Overhead Handover-Skipping Technique for 5G Networks. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Marrakesh, Morocco, 2019, pp. 1-6.

Minoli, D and Occhiogrosso, B. (2019). Practical Aspects for the Integration of 5G Networks and IoT Applications in Smart Cities Environments, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Volume 2019, Article ID 5710834

Tayyab, Muhammad & Gelabert, Xavier & Jantti, Riku. (2019). A Survey on Handover Management: From LTE to NR. IEEE Access. PP. 1-1. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937405.

Lopez-Perez, D., Valcarce, A., De La Roche, G., Liu, E., & Zhang, J. (2008, November). Access methods to WiMAX femtocells: A downlink system-level case study. In Communication Systems, 2008. ICCS 2008. 11th IEEE Singapore International Conference on (pp. 1657-1662). IEEE.â€

Nasrin, W., & Xie, J. (2017). Signaling cost analysis for handoff decision algorithms in femtocell networks. In Communications (ICC), 2017 IEEE International Conference on(pp. 1-6). IEEE.â€

Deswal, S., & Singhrova, A. (2017). A Vertical Handover Algorithm in Integrated Macrocell Femtocell Networks. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 7(1), 299.â€

Mandour, M. & Gebali, F. Elbayoumy, A. & Hamid, G. & Abdelaziz, A. (2019). Handover Optimization and User Mobility Prediction in LTE Femtocells Network. IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, USA, Jan 2019 (pp.1-6). 10.1109/ICCE.2019.8662064.

Omitola, O. O., & Srivastava, V. M. (2017). An Enhanced Handover Algorithm in LTE-Advanced Network. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(2), 2925-2938.â€

Cheikh, A. B., Ayari, M., Langar, R., & Saidane, L. A. (2016). OHDP: Optimized handover with direction prediction scheme using linear regression for femtocell networks. In Performance Evaluation and Modeling in Wired and Wireless Networks (PEMWN), International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.â€

Al-Ayyoub, M., Husari, G., & Mardini, W. (2016). Improving vertical handoffs using mobility prediction. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 1(7), 413-419.â€

Yun, JH. (2019). Handover-Driven Interference Management for Co-Channel Deployment of Femto- and Macro-Cells, Applied Sciences Journal. 9 (17).

Aamodt, K. (2011). Chipcon products from texas instruments. Application Note AN042 (Rev. 1.0).

Bleicher, A. (2013). Millimeter waves may be the future of 5G phones. IEEE spectrum, 8.â€

Ray, S. K., Pawlikowski, K., & Sirisena, H. (2010). Handover in mobile WiMAX networks: The state of art and research issues. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(3), 376-399.â€

Mathonsi, T. E., & Kogeda, O. P. (2016). Handoff delay reduction model for heterogeneous wireless networks. In IST-Africa Week Conference, 2016 (pp. 1-7). IEEE.â€

Hoang, N. D., Nguyen, N. H., & Sripimanwat, K. (2014). Cell selection schemes for femtocell-to-femtocell handover deploying mobility prediction and downlink capacity monitoring in cognitive femtocell networks. In TENCON 2014-2014 IEEE Region 10 Conference (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.4.11988


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development