Classification Modelling of Random Forest to Identify the Important Factors in Improving the Quality of Education
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Indonesian government, “National Education Standards (SNP),†2005.
Indonesian government, Permendikbud No.004/H/AK/2017, “Criteria and Instrument Accreditations for SMA/MA,†2017.
Indonesian government, Permendikbud No. 3 of 2017, “Educational Assessment by The Government and Schools,†2017.
D. Vita, B. Susetyo, and B. Indriyanto, “Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) for National Education Standards (NES) of Secondary School In Indonesia,†Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 11, pp. 2441–2449, Apr 2015.
M. Hijrah, B. Susetyo, and B. Sartono, “Structural Equation Modeling of National Standard Education of Vocational High School Using Partial Least Square Path Modeling,†IJSRSET, vol. 4, pp. 1418–1422, Apr. 2018.
I. A. Setiawan, B. Susetyo, and A. Fitrianto, “Application of Generalized Structural Component Analysis to Identify Relation between Accreditation and National Assessment,†IJSRSET, vol. 4, pp 93–97, Oct 2018.
L. Breiman, “Random Forest,†Machine Learning, vol. 45, pp. 5-32, Apr 2001.
Q. Yanjun. (2017) The CMU website. [Online]. Available: www.cs.cmu.edu/~qyj/papersA08/11-rfbook.pdf.
C. Bunkhumpornpat, K. Sinapiromsaran, and C. Lursinsap, â€DBSMOTE: Density-based Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique,†Application Intelligence, vol. 36, pp. 664–684. Mar. 2012.
J. Brownlee. (2015) Machine Learning Process homepage on machinelearningmastery. [Online]. Available: https://machinelearningmastery.com/tactics-to-combat-imbalanced-classes-in-your-machine-learning-dataset/.
N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “{SMOTE}: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique,†Journal of Atrificial Intelligence Research, vol. 9, pp. 321-357, Jun 2002.
S. Cost and S. Salzberg S, “A Weighted Neighbour Algorithm for Learning with Symbolic Features,†Machine Learning, vol. 10, pp. 57-58, Jan. 1993.
M. N. Adnan and M. Z. Islam, “One-vs-all binarization technique in the context of random forest,†Computational. Intelligence and Machine Learning, vol. 5, pp. 385-390, Apr 2015.
L. Zhou, Q. Wang, and H. Fujita, “One versus one multi-class classification fusion using optimizing decision directed acyclic graph for predicting listing status of companies,†Information Fusion, vol. 36, pp 80–89, Nov. 2016.
E. Hullermeier and S. Vanderlooy S, “Combining predictions in pairwise classification : An optimal adaptive voting strategy and its relation to weighted voting,†Pattern Recognit, vol. 43 pp. 128–142, Jan. 2010.
A. Sen, M. M. Islam, K. Murase, and X. Yao. (2015) IEEEtran homepage on CS.BHAM. [Online]. Available: http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~xin/papers/Binarization.pdf.
M. Sandri and P. Zuccolotto, Data Analysis, Classification and the Forward Search, Zani S., cccc A., M. Riani, and M. Vichi., Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006.
P. Probst, M. Wright, and A-L. Boulesteix. (2018) The ARXIV website. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.03515.pdf.
T. M. Oshiro, P. S. Perez, and J. A. Baranauskas, “How many trees in a random forest?†in Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition: 8th International Conference, 2012, paper Proceedings, vol. 7376, p. 154.
P. Probst and A-L. Boulesteix. (2017) The ARXIV website. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.06146.pdf.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.2.8878
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development