Ambar: A Competence-Evaluating System for Preschool Children

Elena Fabiola Ruiz Ledesma, Laura Ivoone Garay Jiménez, Chadwick Carreto Arellano

Abstract


This paper describes the development and implementation of AMBAR: an evaluation system whose objective is to measure children’s competence achievement during the early childhood better, and provide support material according to the child’s needs. Based on a predetermined scale, a level of achievement of each competency is assigned to the child, according to said level, the system will provide digital educational resources to the student, as to aid their development and reinforce previously acquired knowledge. After the child has completed their assigned activities, AMBAR will reevaluate their learning, assign them a new level of achievement, and provide new exercises. The system does also generate a results record for every student. The employed methodology was of a mixed nature; qualitative, because of the description of profiles associated to descriptively analyzed categories, and quantitative, given that statistic significant differences (p=0.5) were determined before and after the use of any resources for any of said categories.


Keywords


Competences, evaluation, expert system, Preschool

Full Text:

PDF

References


I. Abakumova, I. A. Bakaeva, and K. Y. Kolesina, “Technologies of initiating students into independent (self-guided) activity in supplementary distance learning.†International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering, and Education, vol. 4(2), pp. 1-8, 2016.

A. Badia, L. Chumpitaz, J. Vargas, and G. Suárez, G. “La percepción de la utilidad de la tecnología conforma su uso para enseñar y aprender†REDIE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 18(3), 95-105, 2016.

Stosic, L., “The importance of educational technology in teachingâ€. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, vol. 3(1), pp. 111-114, 2015.

H. Jaakko, L. Lasse, K. Kristiina, and R. Antii., “Visual tools as mediational means: A methodological investigationâ€. Journal of Early Childhood Research, vol. 15(4), 359-373, 2017.

COCENDI (2010a). Misión y Visión de la COCENDI.

COCENDI (2010b). Programa de Educación Inicial (PEI).

SEP (2011). Programa de Estudio. Guía para la educadora.

ESCOM-IPN. (2016) Laboratorio para el desarrollo de prototipos informático-educativos- Final Report. Registred in SIP. 20141665. México, D.F.

R. Abascal-Mena, and E. López-Ornelas, El uso de m-learning para motivar al alumno en su aprendizaje: caso de estudio en la UAM Cuajimalpa. In C. R. Jaimez, K. S. Miranda, E. Vázquez and F. Vázquez (Eds.), Estrategias didácticas en educación superior basadas en el aprendizaje: innovación educativa y TIC (pp. 46-66). Ciudad de México, México: UAM, 2017.

Salas-Rueda, R. A. (2016). Diseño y análisis de un Sistema web educativo considerando

B. Novkovic-Cvetkovic, & D. Stanojevic., “Educational needs of teacher for introduction and application of innovative models in educational work to improve teaching.†International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering, and Education, vol. 5(1), 49-56, 2017.

A. Lynn., “Methodological reflections on the use of systematic reviews in early childhood researc.†Journal of Early Childhood Research, vol. 16(1), 18, 2018.

S. Papert., Desafío a la mente: Computadoras y educación. Buenos Aires, Arentina: Editorial Galápago, 1987.

S. Papert, and I. Harel., (2002). Situar el Construccionismo. Traducción del Centro Latinoamericano para la Competitividad y el Desarrollo Sostenible (INCAE). Retrieved June 14, 2017 from, Ihttp://web.media.mit.edu/~calla/web_comunidad/Readings/

SEP (2013). Programa de estudio Preescolar

R. Hernández-Sampieri, C. Fernández-Collado and P. Baptista-Lucio, Metodología de la investigación, 5ª ed. México: McGraw-Hill, 2010

Badaró, S., Ibañez, L., & Agüero, M. (2013). Sistemas Expertos: Fundamentos, Metodologías y Aplicaciones.

Rouse, M. (2017). What is the expert system?. SearchHealthIT.

M. Pérez-Cordoba, M. E. García, and J. A. Hernández, “Consideraciones especiales para realizar pruebas de usabilidad con niños: Caso de Estudioâ€. ReCIBE. Revista electrónica de Computación, Informática Biomédica y Electrónica, vol. 4(1), pp.135-246, 2015.

A. Donker, and P. Markopoulos. “A comparison of Think-aloud, Questionnaires, and Interviews for testing usability with children.†People and Computers XVI – Memorable, 2002, p. 305-3016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.2.8232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development