Evaluation of Malaysian Universities Websites based on Quality in Use Evaluation Model
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Kim, S., & Stoel, L. (2004). Dimensional hierarchy of retail website quality. Information & management, 41(5), 619-633.
OrehovaÄki, T., Granić, A., & Kermek, D. (2013). Evaluating the perceived and estimated quality in use of Web 2.0 applications. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(12), 3039-3059.
International Organization for Standardization. Systems and Software Engineering -- Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQUARE) - System and Software Quality Models. ISO. 2011;2011(25010):34.
Lin, H. F. (2010). An application of fuzzy AHP for evaluating course website quality. Computers & Education, 54(4), 877-888.
Jabar, M. A., Usman Abbas Usman, and F. Sidi. "Usability Evaluation of Universities' Websites." International Journal of Information Processing and Management 5.1 (2014): 10
Manzoor M, Hussain W. A Web Usability Evaluation Model for Higher Education Providing Universities of Asia. Sci, Tech Dev. 2012;31(2):183-192.
Dominic, P. D. D., & Jati, H. (2010, June). Evaluation method of Malaysian university website: Quality website using hybrid method. In Information Technology (ITSim), 2010 International Symposium in (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Mustafa, S. H., & Al-Zoua’bi, L. F. (2008, December). Usability of the academic websites of Jordan's universities an evaluation study. In Proceedings of the 9th International Arab Conference for Information Technology (pp. 31-40).
Plaza, I., Marcuello, J. J., Igual, R., & Arcega, F. (2009, June). Proposal of a quality model for educational software. In EAEEIE Annual Conference, 2009 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
OrehovaÄki, T., Babić, S., & Jadrić, M. (2014, June). Exploring the validity of an instrument to measure the perceived quality in use of Web 2.0 applications with educational potential. In International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies (pp. 192-203). Springer, Cham.
Hwang, G. J., Huang, T. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2004). A group-decision approach for evaluating educational web sites. Computers & Education, 42(1), 65-86.
Huang, T. C. K., & Huang, C. H. (2010). An integrated decision model for evaluating educational web sites from the fuzzy subjective and objective perspectives. Computers & Education, 55(2), 616-629.
Nwasra, N., Basir, N., & Marhusin, M. F. (2015, December). A framework for evaluating QinU based on ISO/IEC 25010 and 25012 standards. In Software Engineering Conference (MySEC), 2015 9th Malaysian (pp. 70-75). IEEE.
International Organisation for Standardization ISO. Systems and Software Engineering - Vocabulary. ISO/IEC/IEEE 247652010E. 2010;(1):1-418. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2010.5733835.
Srichetta, P., & Thurachon, W. (2012). Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate and select product of notebook computers. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization, 2(2), 168.
Universities. www.usim.edu.my, www.ukm.edu.my www.upm.my ,www.msu.edu.my, www.mmu.edu.my, www.iukl.edu.my. Accessed: June 2016
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 207-219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage publications.
Kline, R. B., & Santor, D. A. (1999). Principles & practice of structural equation modelling. Canadian Psychology, 40(4), 381.
Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill Inc. 1980:17-34.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Information and control. Fuzzy sets, 8(3), 338-353.
Yang, C. C., & Chen, B. S. (2004). Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 21(6), 543-550.
Torfi, F., Farahani, R. Z., & Rezapour, S. (2010). Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Applied Soft Computing, 10(2), 520-528.
Erensal, Y. C., Öncan, T., & Demircan, M. L. (2006). Determining key capabilities in technology management using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Turkey. Information Sciences, 176(18), 2755-2770.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26.
Gogus, O., & Boucher, T. O. (1998). Strong transitivity, rationality and weak monotonicity in fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94(1), 133-144.
Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 17(3), 233-247.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.4-2.6828
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development