Impact Assessment of State Assistance Program to Agri-based Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in the Philippines

Charles Allen L. Herpacio, Hanilyn Hidalgo


The Philippine business economy is largely fuelled by micro, small and medium enterprises.  In order to cope with the competition with large firms in the industry, the government has poured investments in form of technology upgrading in the last 15 years. The research aimed to assess the impact on productivity and profitability of state assistance to agri-based micro, small enterprises.  Partial Budget Analysis was used in assessing the profitability of the proponent after the intervention. The study showed an average increase in enterprises' production volume, sales level, and generated employment by 157.9%, 51.65%, and 191.82%, respectively. Further, the assistance generated a positive increase in income. However, the defective equipment, failure to meet the repayment schedule, and non-compliance to documentary requirements were among the major problems encountered by the proponent during program implementation. Nonetheless, the state assistance was able to spur innovations among the enterprises. Market potential, market knowledge, financial capability to repay the loan as well as the entrepreneur’s resiliency were some of the observed success factors of MSMEs. With its positive firm-level impact, the state assistance program has generally been able to improve its proponent’s competitiveness and thus worthy for continuous implementation.


impact assessment; state assistance; enterprises impact; agri-based enterprises.

Full Text:



The department of trade and industry website. [Online]. Available:

ASEAN Strategic Action Plan for SME Development 2016-2025, ASEAN, 2015.

Aldaba, R. & Aldaba, F. Toward competitive and innovative ASEAN SMEs: Philippine SME policy index 2012. Submitted to Philippine Institute or Development Studies. Discussion Paper Series No. 2014-30. June 2014.

Enterprises in Asia: Fostering Dynamism in SMEs. Asian Development Bank, 2009.

(2015). DOST-Science and Technology Information Institute homepage on Facebook. [Online]. Available:

Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation, OECD and Eurostat, 2005

R. Olughor, “Effect of innovation on the performance of SMEs organization in Nigeriaâ€, Management, pp. 90-95, 2015.

Salim and Sulaiman. “Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: A Study of Malaysian Small and Medium Sized Enterprisesâ€, International Journal of Business and Management, pp. 118-125, 2011.

B. Hall, F. Lotti, and J. Mairesse. 2008, December. Innovation and productivity in SMEs: Empirical evidence for Italy. NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge MA 02138. [Online]. Available:

Llanto, G., and del Prado, F. Does innovation mediate good performance? Submitted to Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Discussion Series Paper no. 2015-06. January 2015.

G. Lopez-Acevedo, and H. Tan. “Impact evaluation of SME programs in Latin America and Caribbean†). The World Bank, Report No. 52668-LAC, 2010.

Isic Rev. 3 Technology intensity definition: Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities, OECD, 2011.

G. Becker, “Growing human capital investment in China compared to falling investment in the United States,†Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 34, pp. 517-524, 2012.

R.E.S. Fontenele, J.E.O. Cabral, S.H.A.C. Forte and M.P.B. Costa, “Patterns of technological innovation: A comparative analysis between low-tech and high-tech industries in Brazil,†International Journal of Innovation, vol. 4, pp. 97-111, 2016.

T. Ramayah, O. Mohamad, A. Omar, M. Marimuthu and J.Y.A. Leen, “Determinants of technology adoption among malaysian SMEs: An IDT perspective,†Journal of ICT, vol. 12, pp. 103-119, 2013.

N.H. Abdullah, A. Shamsuddin, E. Wahab, and N.A. Hamid, “Preliminary qualitative findings on technology adoption of malaysian SMEs,†in IEEE CHUSER, 2012.

M. Goedhuys and R. Veugelers, “Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and groowth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil,†Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 23, pp. 516-529, 2012.

A. Conte and M. Vivarelli. Succeeding in innovation: Key insights on the role of R&D and technological acquisition drawn from company data. Submitted to Institute for the Study of Labor. Discussion Paper no. 7671. October 2013.

J. Asma, “Effects of the small enterprises technology upgrading program of the department of science and technology–philippines on the productivity of beneficiary enterprises in CALABARZON,†Journal of Economics, Management and Agricultural Development, vol. 1, pp. 85-98, 2015.

R. Harrison, J. Jaumandreu, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters, “Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries,†International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 35, pp. 29-43, Jul. 2014.

G.A. Crespi and E. Tacsir, “Effect of innovation on employment in Latin America,†IDB-TN-496, Dec. 2012.

B. Dachs and B. Peters, “Innovation, employment growth, and foreign ownership of firms: A European perspective,†Research Policy, vol. 43, pp. 214-232, 2014.

N. Nawai and M. N. M. Shariff, “Loan repayment problems in microfinance programs that use individual lending approach: A qualitative analysis,†Journal of Transformaitve Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, pp. 93-99, 2013.

S. Guliman, “An evaluation of financial literacy of micro and small enterprise owners in iligan city: Knowledge and skills,†in 9th Global Business Conference, 2015.

W. Sucuahi, “Determinants of financial literacy of microenterpreneurs in davao city,†International Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 1, pp. 44-51, 2013.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development