Public Toilets Design Thinking in the Architecture Design Process

Triyatni Martosenjoyo, Rahmi Amin Ishak, Syarif Beddu, Syavir Latif


Although architectural issues show awareness of the importance of good quality public toilets, it does not take special time to discuss them in the design process. Public toilets are considered by architects as something universal, although many facts show that public toilets are always contextual. To this day, the process of designing architectural education has resulted in architects using the Design Methods approach. Along with the paradigm shift in seeing reality, the Design Methods movement shifted to Participatory Design which considers it important for users to participate in the design process. In terms of public toilets, architects still use existing universal standards and have not involved users in producing public toilets according to their respective cultural meanings. This research aims to find out whether the change in the view of the design process approach from Design Methods to Participatory Design also occurs in the design process of public toilets. The research was conducted involving the participation of architectural education final project students, cross-city professional architects, and their clients. The research method with a qualitative approach uses a constructive paradigm. The data validation and analysis use the triangulation test. The results show that the architect's design process generally still uses the Design Methods approach, even though architects do not actually conduct the design phases as theorized by Design Methods.


Public toilets; design methods; participatory design; architecture.

Full Text:



T. Martosenjoyo, H. Naping, M. R. Rahim, and M. Lampe, “Public Toilets, Stink and Power,” Asia Pacific J. Anthropol., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 229–247, 2020.

C. Greed, “Join the queue: Including women’s toilet needs in public space,” Sociol. Rev., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 908–926, 2019.

X. Wang, J. Han, and E. Lichtfouse, “Unprotected mothers and infants breastfeeding in public amenities during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Environmental Chemistry Letters. Springer, pp. 1–4, 2020.

N. R. Broyer, “Through the restroom mirror: accessibility and visibility in public space,” Disabil. Soc., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1483–1504, 2020.

K. W. Michael, “Better design quality of public toilets for visually impaired persons: an all-round concept in design for the promotion of health,” J. R. Soc. Promot. Health, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 313–319, 2008.

K. E. Hedges, Architectural graphic standards. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

J. De Chiara and J. H. Callender, Time saver standards for building types. New York: Mcgraw-Heal Inc, 2007.

E. Neufert and Neufert, Neufert Architects’ Data. Blackwell science ltd, 2012.

J. C. Jones, Design methods. John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

W. M. Pena and S. A. Parshall, Problem seeking: An architectural programming primer. John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

C. Alexander, A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford university press, 2018.

A. A. Bin Ruslan et al., “A Value-Based Decision-Making Model for Selecting Sustainable Materials for Buildings,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.11.6.14411.

J. A. LaGro Jr, Site analysis: Informing context-sensitive and sustainable site planning and design. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

M. P. Sarkisian, “Fazlur Khan’s legacy: towers of the future,” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 802–821, 2016.

F. D. K. Ching and J. F. Eckler, Introduction to architecture. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

F. D. K. Ching, Architecture: Form, space, and order. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

J. C. Snyder, A. J. Catanese, and T. MacGintry, Introduction to architecture. McGraw-Hill, 1979.

Y. Jiang, “The Similarities and Differences between Classical Architecture and Modern Architecture in Design Methods and Aesthetic Theories,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, vol. 267, no. 5, p. 52017.

H. W. J. Rittel and M. M. Webber, “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning,” Policy Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155–169, 1973.

P. E. Vermaas and U. Pesch, “Revisiting Rittel and Webber’s Dilemmas: Designerly Thinking Against the Background of New Societal Distrust,” She Ji J. Des. Econ. Innov., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 530–545, 2020.

T. S. Kuhn and I. Hacking, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50t h Anniversary Edition,” Chicago Univ., 2012.

J. C. Jones, Designing designing. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021.

J. M. Greenbaum, A design of one’s own: towards participatory design in the United States. New Jersey: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1993.

S. Grabow, Christopher Alexander: The search for a new paradigm in architecture. Routledge Kegan & Paul, 1983.

B. Jiang, “The Foxconn Factory Site, Methods, and Procedure for Design Interventions,” in Landscape Empowerment, Springer, 2021, pp. 2–10.

T. Bratteteig and I. Wagner, Disentangling participation: power and decision-making in participatory design. Springer, 2014.

F. Kensing and J. Greenbaum, Heritage: Having a Say. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (J. Simonsen, & T. Robertson, Trans). New York: Routledge, 2013.

A. Sealy, “How Japan’s Music-playing, Water-spraying TOTO Toilets Took Over the World,” CNN, 2018. (accessed March 01, 2021).

The Conversation, “Toilets of the future must be designed with people in mind, not technology,” 2018. (accessed March 01, 2021).

D. Yachnin, G. Gharib, J. Jutai, and H. Finestone, “Technology-assisted toilets: Improving independence and hygiene in stroke rehabilitation,” J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng., vol. 4, p. 2055668317725686, 2017.

L. J. Bannon and P. Ehn, “Design: design matters in Participatory Design,” in Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, 2013, pp. 57–83.

D. Cuff, Architecture: The story of practice. Massachusetts: Mit Press, 1992.

L. N. Groat and D. Wang, Architectural research methods. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

T. Mostowlansky and A. Rota, “Emic and etic,” The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Antrhopology, 2020.

J. P. Spradley, Participant observation. Waveland Press, 2016.

G. Makstutis, Design process in architecture: From concept to completion. Laurence King, 2018.

M. Rezaei, Reviewing Design Process Theories: Discourses in Architecture, Urban Design and Planning Theories. Springer Nature, 2020.

A. Sarwat and M. A. Lc, Ensiklopedia Fikih Indonesia 3: Zakat. Gramedia pustaka utama, 2019.

K. E. Howell, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology SAGE Publication London. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2013.

E. G. Guba, The alternative paradigm dialog. The paradigm dialog. EG Guba. London: Sage Publications, Inc, 1990.

R. Luck, “Participatory design in architectural practice: Changing practices in future making in uncertain times,” Des. Stud., vol. 59, pp. 139–157, 2018.

R. C. Smith, C. Bossen, and A. M. Kanstrup, “Participatory design in an era of participation,” CoDesign, vol. 13, no. 2. Taylor & Francis, pp. 65–69, 2017.

T. Robertson and J. Simonsen, “Participatory Design: an introduction,” in Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, 2012, pp. 21–38.

E. Brandt, T. Binder, and E. B.-N. Sanders, “Tools and techniques: Ways to engage telling, making and enacting,” in Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, 2012, pp. 165–201.

A. Botero, S. Hyysalo, C. Kohtala, and J. Whalen, “Getting participatory design done: From methods and choices to translation work across constituent domains,” Int. J. Des., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 17, 2020.

T. Wainwright and G. Manville, “Financialization and the third sector: Innovation in social housing bond markets,” Environ. Plan. A, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 819–838, 2017.

C. E. R. Calderón, O. J. S. Parra, and S. C. V. Ayala, “Water Quality Prediction and Detection of the Vibrio Cholerae Bacteria,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 2369–2374, 2021, doi:

J. H. Neyrey, Clean/Unclean, Pure/Polluted, and Holy/Profane: The Idea and System of Purity. Peaboy: Hendrickson Publisher Inc, 1996.

Y. M. Reddy, S. Raghavan, and S. C. Vedala, “A Narrative Exposition on Public Toilet Usage by Women: A Study from Warangal,” Indian J. Gend. Stud., vol. 26, no. 1–2, pp. 108–137, 2019.

W. S. Reynolds, C. Kowalik, M. R. Kaufman, R. R. Dmochowski, and J. H. Fowke, “Women’s perceptions of public restrooms and the relationships with toileting behaviors and bladder symptoms: a cross-sectional study,” J. Urol., vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 310–315, 2020.

E. Ellisa and L. Luana, “Female restrooms in the tourist destination: how the socio-spatial conditions of public toilets influence women’s perception of safety,” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., no. just-accepted, 2021.

A. H. Maslow, A theory of human motivation. New Delhi: General Press, 2019.

M. van der Linden, Architecture: Changing Spatial Transitions Between Context, Construction and Human Activities. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte.Ltd, 2021.

K. Marx, Das Kapital Volume I. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1974.

G. W. F. Hegel, Hegel: Elements of the philosophy of right, Revised. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

R. Scruton, The aesthetics of architecture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.

S. Brott, Architecture for a Free Subjectivity: Deleuze and Guattari at the Horizon of the Real. Routledge, 2016.

C. Kluckhohn, Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951.

M. D. Hills, “Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s values orientation theory,” Online readings Psychol. Cult., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 919–2307, 2002.

J. Robbins and J. Sommerschuh, “Values | Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology,” 2016. (accessed March 30, 2021).

Kementerian Keuangan RI, “Siklus APBN - DJPb | Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan Kementerian Keuangan RI.” [Online]. Available:

Fajar, “Gubernur Sulsel Keluarkan Surat Edaran Penyesuaian Sistem Kerja ASN dalam Rangka pencegahan Covid-19 – FAJAR,” FajarNews, 2020. (accessed Jun. 30, 2020).

T. Robertson and I. Wagner, “Ethics: Engagement, representation and politics-in-action,” in Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, 2012, pp. 84–105.

C. DiSalvo, A. Clement, and V. Pipek, “Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities,” in Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, 2012, pp. 202–230.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development