Study of Nisi Chicken Diversity Based on Morphometric Analysis and Bioacoustic Analysis

Alfi Sophian, - Abinawanto, Astari Dwiranti, Maria Ulfah

Abstract


— This study aims to obtain data on the diversity of nisi chickens based on morphometric analysis of body weight bioacoustic analysis of the crowing sound. The number of studies that link morphometric analysis with bioacoustic analysis is one of the reference sources used as a reference in conducting this study. In the future, it is hoped that this research will be one of the contributions of knowledge for further research or similar research. The parameters used in the analysis are neck length for morphometric analysis and bioacoustic parameters using the number of crowing syllables, crowing duration, and wave frequency. The data generated from the morphometric analysis were then analyzed statistically for the average test using ANOVA which was analyzed together with the data generated from the Cold Edit Pro software to conclude the resulting data. The parameters observed were the number of crowed syllables, crowing duration, wave frequency, and crowing frequency. The results showed that the duration of the crowing of the nisi chicken ranged from 1.922 seconds to -2.064 seconds with an average duration of 1.9837 seconds. The results of morphometric analysis of neck length obtained that the average neck length of 30 chicken samples was 10.25 cm with the shortest range being 10.0 cm and the longest being 10.8 cm. The results of sound analysis for the wavelength frequency of the crowing of the nisi chicken ranged from 698.10 Hz - 786.22 Hz with an average wavelength of 733.89 Hz. For the number of syllables produced from the crowing sound, uniform results are obtained in the form of 7 syllables. The results of the analysis using ANOVA obtained an F count of 0.001447 smaller than F table 1.656383. The conclusion in this study is that the neck length morphometric analysis does not affect the bioacoustic analysis so that the diversity of nisi chickens analyzed shows uniformity.

Keywords


Rooster, bioacoustics, frequency, Cold edit pro, Morphometric.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Sophian and Abinawanto, “Study of Co1 and BIK BCL2 Gene Analysis in Gorontalo Local Chicken,†J. Hunan Univ. Nat. Sci., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 220–227, 2022, doi: 10.55463/issn.1674-2974.49.1.28.

A. Sophian, “Gorontalo Local Chicken Diversity Based on IGF-1 ( Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 ) Gene Analysis,†2021.

A. Sophian, Abinawanto, U. C. Nisa, and Fadhillah, “Morphometric analysis of Gorontalo (Indonesia) native chickens from six different regions,†Biodiversitas, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1757–1763, 2021, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d220420.

A. Sophian and A. Abinawanto, “Diversity of Nerve Growth Factor and Progesterone Receptor Genes in Nisi Chicken 2 . Materials And Methods,†vol. 48, no. 10, 2021.

S. A. M. Osman, T. Yonezawa, and M. Nishibori, “Origin and genetic diversity of Egyptian native chickens based on complete sequence of mitochondrial DNA D-loop region,†Poult. Sci., vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 1248–1256, 2016, doi: 10.3382/ps/pew029.

H. Meydan, C. P. Jang, M. A. Yildiz, and S. Weigend, “Maternal origin of Turkish and Iranian native chickens inferred from mitochondrial DNA D-loop sequences,†Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1547–1554, 2016, doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.1060.

P. Teinlek, K. Siripattarapravat, and C. Tirawattanawanich, “Genetic diversity analysis of Thai indigenous chickens based on complete sequences of mitochondrial DNA D-loop region,†Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 804–811, 2018, doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0611.

A. Hata et al., “Geographic origin and genetic characteristics of japanese indigenous chickens inferred from mitochondrial d-loop region and microsatellite dna markers,†Animals, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1–23, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ani10112074.

N. Dorji, M. Duangjinda, and Y. Phasuk, “Genetic characterization of Bhutanese native chickens based on an analysis of Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus gallus and Gallus gallus spadecieus), domestic Southeast Asian and commercial chicken lines (Gallus gallus domesticus),†Genet. Mol. Biol., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 603–609, 2012, doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572012005000039.

C. J. P. Godinez, P. J. D. Dadios, D. M. Espina, M. Matsunaga, and M. Nishibori, “Population Genetic Structure and Contribution of Philippine Chickens to the Pacific Chicken Diversity Inferred From Mitochondrial DNA,†Front. Genet., vol. 12, no. July, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.698401.

Q. Li et al., “Genetic diversity and relationship of Dulong chickens using mitochondrial DNA control region,†Mitochondrial DNA Part B Resour., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 275–280, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1700837.

L. Zhang et al., “Genetic evidence from mitochondrial DNA corroborates the origin of Tibetan chickens,†PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172945.

M. Petracci, F. Sirri, M. Mazzoni, and A. Meluzzi, “Comparison of breast muscle traits and meat quality characteristics in 2 commercial chicken hybrids,†Poult. Sci., vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 2438–2447, 2013, doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03087.

“Morphology of Breast and Thigh Muscles of Red Jungle Fowl, Malaysian Village Chicken, and Commercial Broiler Chicken.Pdf.†.

Abinawanto, A. Sophian, P. Effendi, and T. Siswantining, “Short communication: Variation in vocal cord morphometric characters among dangdut type and the slow type gaga chicken,†Biodiversitas, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1902–1905, 2018, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190542.

Abinawanto, A. Sophian, R. Lestari, A. Bowolaksono, P. S. Efendi, and R. Afnan, “Analysis of IGF-1 gene in ayam ketawa (Gallus gallus domesticus) with dangdut and slow type vocal characteristics,†Biodiversitas, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2004–2010, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d200729.

S. R. A. Bugiwati, M. I. A. Dagong, and T. Tokunaga, “Crowing characteristics of native singing chicken breeds in Indonesia,†IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 492, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012100.

F. Arlina, Rusfidra, D. Andriano, and C. Sumatri, “Short communication: The type and sound diversity of kukuak balenggek chicken (gallus gallus domesticus) reared in West Sumatra, Indonesia,†Biodiversitas, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1914–1919, 2020, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210518.

A. Abinawanto and P. S. Effendi, “The bioacoustics analysis and the morphometrics study of the gaga’s chicken (Ayam Ketawa) from Pinrang and Kebayoran Lama,†AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2023, no. 2018, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5064134.

T. Zulistiana and A. Abinawanto, “Morphometric and bioacoustic analysis Gaga chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) at Bangkalan, Kamal Madura,†AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2023, no. October 2018, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5064139.

B. S. Daryono, M. Mushlih, and A. B. I. Perdamaian, “Crowing sound and inbreeding coefficient analysis of Pelung chicken (Gallus Gallus domesticus),†Biodiversitas, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2451–2457, 2021, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d220501.

W. Penar, A. Magiera, and C. Klocek, “Applications of bioacoustics in animal ecology,†Ecol. Complex., vol. 43, no. June, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100847.

I. Y. Asmara, D. Garnida, and R. Partasasmita, “Crowing characteristics of Pelung chickens at different age and body weight,†Biodiversitas, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 4339–4344, 2020, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210953.

I. Y. Asmara, D. Garnida, and R. Partasasmita, “Short communication: Duration and volume of crowing of pelung chickens of West Java, Indonesia,†Biodiversitas, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 748–752, 2020, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210242.

T. Kuwayama, H. Ogawa, I. Munechika, T. Kono, and K. Ichinoe, “Crowing Characteristics of Jungle Fowls, Japanese Native Breeds and White Leghorn Breed of Chicken.,†Japanese Poult. Sci., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 89–95, 1996, doi: 10.2141/jpsa.33.89.

M. Calviño-Cancela, L. Piña, and J. Martín-Herrero, “Bioacoustic differentiation of calls in the chiffchaff complex,†PeerJ, vol. 10, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.7717/peerj.14261.

M. P. Mcloughlin, R. Stewart, and A. G. McElligott, “Automated bioacoustics: Methods in ecology and conservation and their potential for animal welfare monitoring,†J. R. Soc. Interface, vol. 16, no. 155, 2019, doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0225.

B. S. Daryono, M. Mushlih, and A. B. I. Perdamaian, “Vocalizaon characters and forkhead box p2 (foxp2) polymorphism in Indonesian crowing-type chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus),†Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 131–140, 2020.

O. N. Okumu et al., “Genetic diversity of indigenous chickens from selected areas in Kenya using microsatellite markers,†J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 489–495, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.04.007.

S. Phromnoi, P. Lertwatcharasarakul, and S. Phattanakunanan, “Genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of Khiew-Phalee chickens (Thailand) based on mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b gene sequences,†Biodiversitas, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 750–756, 2022, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d230220.

M. B. Herrera et al., “East African origins for Madagascan chickens as indicated by mitochondrial DNA,†R. Soc. Open Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.1098/rsos.160787.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.12.6.15829

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development