Jitter Correction and SNR Improvement of A-Scan Signal Using Wavelet Denoising and Signal Averaging for a Portable Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography System

Maria Cecilia D. Galvez, Edgar A. Vallar, Tatsuo Shiina, Ernest P. Macalalad, Paulito F. Mandia


Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is used to probe surface cross-sections of various materials in manufacturing, anatomy, and agriculture, among others. In any OCT system, signals have embedded noise in various forms, such as electrical noise and Jitter, which affect the depth profile (A-scan) and image quality. A signal processing method for correcting the Jitter and improving the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and image quality was developed in this study for a portable time-domain (TD) OCT system that utilizes a pc-based oscilloscope for data acquisition.  A stack of five glass coverslips was used as a sample. Each signal from the oscilloscope consists of an A-scan coupled with a trigger signal. Jitter correction was done by first denoising the trigger signal using a combination of moving average and wavelet denoising. A reference trigger was selected, and all other trigger signals were adjusted, including the A-scans.  Once jitter was corrected, the denoising method on the OCT A-scans was employed. The signal averaging method and various wavelet denoising methods were applied to the A-scans of the sample to identify which will give the highest SNR and improved image quality.  Combining averaging of fifty signals and Daubechies 7 (Db7) with hard thresholding reduced the acquisition time and storage space by 50%, improved the SNR by 18 dB, improved the depth profile and image quality of a stack of five glass coverslips. This signal processing method will allow us to characterize and properly visualize cross-sectional images of other samples in the future using our TD-OCT system.


A-scan; denoising; optical coherence tomography; signal-to-noise ratio; wavelets.

Full Text:



D. Huang et al., “Optical Coherence Tomography,” Science (80-. )., vol. 254, pp. 1178–1180, 1991, doi: 10.1126/science.1957169.

J. Welzel, E. Lankenau, R. Birngruber, and R. Engelhardt, “Optical coherence tomography of the human skin,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 958–963, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(97)70072-0.

M. Manfredini et al., “Acne: morphologic and vascular study of lesions and surrounding skin by means of optical coherence tomography,” J. Eur. Acad. Dermatology Venereol., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1541–1546, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1111/jdv.14369.

R. Haak et al., “A handheld OCT probe for intraoral diagnosis on teeth,” in Optics InfoBase Conference Papers, 2019, vol. Part F142-, doi: 10.1117/12.2527185.

H. Lin, Z. Zhang, D. Markl, J. A. Zeitler, and Y. Shen, “A Review of the Applications of OCT for Analysing Pharmaceutical Film Coatings,” Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 12, p. 2700, 2018, doi: 10.3390/app8122700.

V. Srivastava, D. Dalal, A. Kumar, S. Prakash, and K. Dalal, “In vivo automated quantification of quality of apples during storage using optical coherence tomography images,” Laser Phys., vol. 28, no. 6, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1555-6611/aab485.

F. Atry, I. J. De La Rosa, K. R. Rarick, and R. Pashaie, “Design and Implementation Guidelines for a Modular Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Scanner,” Int. J. Opt., vol. 2018, pp. 1–22, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/3726207.

T. Shiina, Y. Moritani, M. Ito, and Y. Okamura, “Long-optical-path scanning mechanism for optical coherence tomography,” Appl. Opt., vol. 42, no. 19, pp. 3795–3799, 2003, doi: 10.1364/ao.42.003795.

W. Drexler and J. G. Fujimoto, Optical coherence tomography: Technology and applications, second edition. Springer International Publishing, 2015.

S. Davidson, “Instrumentation: Measuring digital clock stability and jitter with an oscilloscope,” in EE: Evaluation Engineering, vol. 57, no. 11, Nelson Publishing Inc., 2018, pp. 20–21.

Joint Electron Device Engineering Council, “JEDEC Standard Definition of Skew Specifications for Standard Logic Devices JESD65B,” no. September, Arlington, VA: JEDEC Solid State Technology Association, 2003, p. 1.

R. Guhathakurta, “Denoising of image: A wavelet based approach,” in 2017 8th Industrial Automation and Electromechanical Engineering Conference, IEMECON 2017, Oct. 2017, pp. 194–197, doi: 10.1109/IEMECON.2017.8079587.

M. A. Gungor and K. Gencol, “Developing a Compression Procedure Based on the Wavelet Denoising and JPEG2000 Compression”, Optik (Stuttg)., vol. 218, p. 164933, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164933.

T. Suzuki, B. Liu, and S. Choi, “3D thickness measurement using pulse-driven optical coherence tomography based on wavelet transform,” in Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Sep. 2019, p. 45, doi: 10.1117/12.2534005.

J. Burgess, Wavelets: Principles, analysis and applications. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2018.

R. Gonzalez and R. Woods, Digital Image Processing. New York: Pearson Education, Inc., 2018.

W. Van Drongelen, Signal processing for neuroscientists. Elsevier, 2018.

P. M. Ong, M. C. Galvez, E. Vallar, and T. Shiina, “Wavelet denoising applied to light emitting diode lidar signal,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1374–1378, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1166/asl.2017.8352.

M. Misiti, Y. Misiti, G. Oppenheim, and J.-M. Poggi, Wavelet toolbox: User’s Guide, Version 5. Natick MA: Mathworks Inc., 2020.

H. Mark and J. Workman, “Calibration Transfer - The Instrumentation Aspects,” in Chemometrics in Spectroscopy, 2nd ed., H. Mark and J. Workman, Eds. Academic Press, 2018.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.5.13008


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Published by INSIGHT - Indonesian Society for Knowledge and Human Development